--- description: Learn more about GitHub Copilot price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Australia. Read reviews from verified users and discover similar tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub Copilot Cost & Reviews - Capterra Australia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [AI Coding Assistants](/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) > [GitHub Copilot](/software/1051539/copilot) # GitHub Copilot Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1051539/copilot Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) > Copilot uses advanced AI algorithms to suggest code and entire functions to users in real-time, right from their editor. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 47 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses GitHub Copilot? Coders and Engineers ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 47 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, US - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: USD 0.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Content Generation - Data Augmentation - Natural Language Processing - Simulation and Scenario Generation ## Category - [AI Coding Assistants](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) ## Related Categories - [AI Coding Assistants](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) - [Generative AI Tools](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/34155/generative-ai/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Blaze](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1056061/blaze) — 4.8/5 (724 reviews) 2. [1min.AI](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1065472/1min-ai) — 4.7/5 (486 reviews) 3. [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1049484/chatgpt) — 4.4/5 (376 reviews) 4. [Replit](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1051536/replit) — 4.4/5 (158 reviews) 5. [NightCafe](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1032973/nightcafe) — 4.7/5 (85 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Helpful Coding Assistant" — 4.0/5 > **Osama** | *21 January 2026* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is very helpful for writing code and reduce the chance of repetition of code. It gives useful suggestions and helps with syntax. Good for learning new programming patterns > > **Cons**: Sometimes code suggestions do not match exact requirement. Subscription cost feels high for beginners. > > Overall experience is positive. It improves productivity and helps to speed up tasks. It is a useful assistant, especially for programmers. ----- ### "Fast, Helpful, but Not Always Right" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *28 January 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: GitHub Copilot accelerates coding with smart suggestions, reduces repetitive work, helps explore new APIs, and boosts productivity—especially for quick prototypes and routine tasks—while learning your style. > > **Cons**: Sometimes it suggests incorrect or insecure code, can be repetitive, and may reduce learning by over-relying on autocomplete. > > Helpful for speeding up coding and exploring ideas, but occasional wrong suggestions and reliance risks make it a powerful yet imperfect assistant. ----- ### "Add AI developers to your team who don't get sick or take leave." — 3.0/5 > **Darren** | *28 December 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Brings AI to your programming. Helps with automating tasks, providing suggestions, and can also be a learning tool for syntax and best practices. > > **Cons**: Programmers can become too reliant on it - reducing their need to think. Security concerns on using code to train the model. Cost: It can be expensive and hard to determine ROI. > > AI seems to be everywhere these days, so GitHub Copilot brings AI to the developer. Some developers rely more on it than others, especially new developers. It can be a useful and powerful aid, as long as it is used as intended. ----- ### "A Powerful AI Assistant That Speeds Up Everyday Development" — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *21 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about GitHub Copilot is how much it speeds up coding, especially for repetitive or boilerplate tasks. The code generation is where it really stands out—it can suggest full lines or even entire functions based on a simple comment, which saves a lot of time during development. In terms of ease of use, it’s very straightforward. It works directly inside the IDE, so you don’t have to switch tools or change your workflow. Most of the time it just feels like an advanced autocomplete that understands what you’re trying to do. From a value-for-money perspective, it’s quite good if you code regularly. Even small productivity gains add up quickly, and for developers working daily, it can easily justify the cost. Customization is another strong point. You can tailor its behavior using custom instructions or prompts to better match your coding style, team standards, or project requirements. This makes it more useful over time as it adapts to how you work. Customer support is decent, and there’s a lot of documentation and community content available. In practice, most issues can be resolved through docs or forums rather than direct support. While GitHub Copilot is mainly focused on code generation, it also helps with things like explaining code, writing tests, and generating documentation, which adds to its overall usefulness. However, features like video creation or image generation are not really its focus. Overall, it significantly improves productivity and reduces the time spent on routine coding tasks, making it a valuable tool for everyday development. > > **Cons**: One of the main downsides of GitHub Copilot is that it’s not always accurate, especially when working with more complex logic. It can sometimes suggest code that looks correct at first but needs careful review because it may contain small mistakes or assumptions that don’t fully match the context. Another issue is that it doesn’t always understand the full structure of larger codebases. In bigger projects, the suggestions can feel a bit disconnected or not fully aligned with existing architecture, which means you still need to manually adjust a lot of the output. Performance can also vary. Sometimes suggestions come instantly and are very helpful, but other times it feels less responsive or less relevant, which interrupts the flow a bit. There are also some limitations with deeper understanding of business logic or project-specific rules, so it works best as an assistant rather than something you can fully rely on. Overall, it’s useful, but it still requires a lot of developer oversight to make sure everything is correct and production-ready. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub Copilot has been very positive. It’s become a useful daily tool for speeding up development work and reducing the amount of repetitive coding I need to do. The biggest strength is definitely code generation. It helps with boilerplate code, function suggestions, and even test cases, which saves a lot of time during development. Over time, it feels like it learns the context of what you’re working on and becomes more helpful. In terms of ease of use, it’s very simple to get started. It integrates directly into the IDE, so there’s no need to change your workflow or switch between tools. It just works in the background and suggests code as you type. From a value for money perspective, it’s quite good if you code regularly. The time saved on repetitive tasks and faster development speed makes it worth the cost in most cases. Customization is also useful to some extent—you can guide its behavior with prompts or instructions, which helps it better match your coding style or project needs. Customer support is okay, but most issues are usually resolved through documentation or community discussions rather than direct support. One limitation is that it’s not always perfect with complex logic or large codebases, so you still need to carefully review and adjust the generated code. It’s best seen as an assistant rather than a replacement for actual development thinking. Features like video creation or image generation are not part of Copilot’s scope, so it’s purely focused on code-related tasks. Overall, it significantly improves productivity and makes development faster and more efficient, especially for everyday coding tasks and repetitive work. ----- ### "Pricing changes ruin a good product" — 2.0/5 > **Damien** | *7 July 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: GitHub Copilot used to be an incredible value for code assistance. For the most part, it still excels at code assistance. They have lots of models to choose from, which is nice for productivity. > > **Cons**: Pricing. The pricing changed significantly. From a flat fee to usage-based. The new pricing is nowhere near what it used to be. Its value for what it provides doesn't rival the competition. I have sadly switched to another product due to this issue. > > Good performance, horrible pricing. Very disappointed about the change in pricing. It's no longer even close to affordable. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1051539/copilot) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data