--- description: Learn more about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Australia. Read reviews from verified users and discover similar tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Cost & Reviews - Capterra Australia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Requirements Management Software](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS](/software/1020821/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next) # IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1020821/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1020821/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next?page=2) > Cloud-based solution that helps businesses capture, trace, analyze and manage changes to requirements. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 8 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.4/5** | 8 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: IBM ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Prioritization ## Category - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 5. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) ## Reviews ### "DNG - IBM CLM Requirement Management Solution" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *6 September 2022* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Integration across different tools with respect to overall product lifecycle including Software, Hardware, Electrical and Mechanical domain > > **Cons**: Due to High Cost, solution is not feasible for small industry ----- ### "Nice control to project" — 5.0/5 > **Sabri** | *2 April 2022* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Ability to have all artifacts in one place with total tracibility. We can get a great view for requirements automatic tracking to changes made in objects Easy linking between modules with DXL Nice filters and costumizable > > **Cons**: Sometimes is slow to connect and launch Complexity of setting up the software or to make changes after components connection done dependencies with other softwares > > As an Enginner in big organisation from few years, I'm using Doors every day to get updates about projects that we are working on. This tool made our working developement easier since we can get a look in any requirement for projects, with a total tracibilities. ----- ### "Requirement Management" — 4.0/5 > **Muthu** | *21 November 2022* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to capture system requirements and software requirements, easy to maintain traceability as per v model > > **Cons**: System loading time is to read software requirements and system requirements are some times very slow > > Over all experience is good, by this we can maintain requirements traceability in all system life cycle ----- ### "Using DOORS for mapping the technical requirements." — 4.0/5 > **Mayur** | *15 December 2022* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: All the attributes are systematically aligned with the required texts.The filtering option can be efficiently used.Multiple users can access/edit a single module using the shareable edit option. > > **Cons**: Sometimes the linking of the requirements takes a lot of time to reflect.The software takes time when multiple people access the same module. > > It is the systematic way of mapping / arranging the requirements and their associated factors/links under one heading. The changes made in the modules fall under one person category which makes it easy to understand who has made the changes, and what are the changes, and analysis comments provide the information of why the changes were made. ----- ### "Requirement Management Solution for Geotechnical Industry" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *26 September 2022* | Civil Engineering | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: We were using IBM Rational DOORS for Requirement Management, Traceability. Customization using dxl scripting is really interesting feature. > > **Cons**: Cost of solution is not affordable for small scale industry so we need to use sharing based single license for our team. > > IBM Rational Suite products are mostly used by all industries with best features. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1020821/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1020821/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | it | | ----- ## Structured Data