Tricentis qTest Reviews

Perfect tool for Agile management

Comments: Really well versed usability of the tool in the project. Used almost all the features mentioned in pros, helpful for scrum meetings, getting updates on time, good understanding of the names in tool like release, sprint, labels, etc., Reporting was very colorful for effective presentation, user management is very easy across projects.

Pros:

Perfectly fit for agile projects, story board, customization of the product, reporting, bug management, reporting and analysis, user management, project milestones, color coding, flexible to upload/link attachments, shortcut keys for accessing items, integration with other market tools like blueprint, microsoft azure, caliber, etc.,

Cons:

I liked all the features, least item is managing API code with postman tool and other coding features.

A Great tool to manage all QA cycle

Comments: it has been a great experience to work with QA tasks

Pros:

Its easy integration with different tools such as JIRA and the way it allows to manage test cases, requirements, bugs and everything related to SDLC

Cons:

It becomes slow to run Insights queries when you have many projects selected

Review of qTest

Pros:

The software was integrated with qTest to bring over requirements and create test cases and execute them in qTest. We were able to run queries to find specific modules and run specific test cases. We were also able to effectively track which test cases had been executed and the result of those test cases. Then, qTest created helpful infographics to help us further track how far along in the test execution process we were.

Cons:

Sometimes, the requirements between qTest and JIRA did not sync well. There were many times where the number of requirements in each software was not the same. Along with this, some of the qTest add-ons such as Insights are very difficult to work with and not intuitive as normal data analysis tools.

Great Testing Management for the Software QA engineers and Managers.

Comments: We moved from HP ALM over to qTest few years ago; it has been for us from night to day. The integration of the tool with Jira has helped the team to improve quality overall.Great to control the quality process and improve our test case development process

Pros:

The ease of use.Be able to copy/paste images to test cases steps.Version control.Execution process.

Cons:

Application updates for patching existing issues and new features takes way too long to wait.

Alternatives Considered: Jira, Zephyr and TestRail

Reasons for Choosing Tricentis qTest: HP costs

Reasons for Switching to Tricentis qTest: Easy of use and quality of the product,This tool is completely dedicated to the Test Management

Great Test Cases Management tool

Comments: Great experience to track test cases executions, and bugs integration with JIRA

Pros:

Its integration with JIRA and the capabilities it provides to execute test cases

Cons:

Slowness to run queries using Insight module

A great tool for Bug and Requirements tracking

Comments: A great tool for Bug and Requirements tracking

Pros:

Its easy integration with SDLC tools such as JIRA to gather needed information

Cons:

It becomes slow to query many projects through Insights

Lots of functionality

Comments: Have only been using this for about 6 months now and haven't really gotten used to all of the functionality. I believe I am not utilizing all of the functionality, need to take some time aside and learn about more of the bells and whistles.

Pros:

This software integrates with The Atlassian Jira software pretty well. I can select the Story or Bug that is imported from Jira to a test script and then the text execution data will be displayed in Jira. The catch is that unless you have a qTest license you can't see the actual details of the test when you click on it. You can also click the little create bug button while running a test case in qTest and it will automatically create the Bug in Jira and populate as much data as it can from the current test case.

Cons:

I'm not sure if it is our implementation - but it seems to hiccup often, I randomly get errors or steps don't display. My problem is that I sometimes forget to click the Save button and I walk away and if the session times out - then all your work is lost.

qTest is the best!

Comments: Overall, I find qTest a valuable test management tool. It is time-saving to do batch approvals on large numbers of test cases. Also, creating the parameters further defines the requirements, which facilitates test design and creation.

Pros:

qTest is very useful when creating and executing large batches of test cases, especially when running the same test cases in different environments. This saves time and effort, great feature!

Cons:

Could use graphics to show test coverage and progress, rather than just a percentage report.

Agile Test Management

Comments: We are trying to replace HP ALM because it's only compatible with an old IE version, has TERRIBLE UI and disrupts a lot of our workflows. If qTest were a more reasonable cost, we would seriously consider implementing this agile test management suite.

Pros:

I like how easy it is to save work, the intuitive UI and the color scheme for quick status checks. The layout is straightforward like Rally's and it can be a requirements repository. Integration seems to be easy and possible with requirements and Jira.

Cons:

I didn't like how many steps it seems to take to set up the test plan folders. Our testing is pretty rigorous and used for FDA - approved medical devices so that some of the default workflows and fields are not robust enough. I don't like that the Actual Results field can be left blank as long as you select a test status.

Qtest for test scripts design

Comments: I use Qtest daily for test script creation and execution. I can see my execution in Jira so I can keep track of my completed tasks. I would recommend this software to other QA analysts.

Pros:

-Easy to use -Integration with Jira is the main reason we use this -Test Script creation

Cons:

-Minor bugs when saving a test script could be fixed -If you copy from word or any other source, the text is not always displayed correctly

Its a nice tool for test management with good support available online

Comments: Its is nice for test management. There is a lot of online support available.

Pros:

Its easy to use and its feature to record and create tests

Cons:

The copying of folders across modules. Also its not good for requirement management and hence creating test traceability

Over all Qtest is good, easy to use tool

Pros:

Easy to use.Copy, paste & moving is simple

Cons:

Not much features for automation testing

My Review of qTest-Test Management Tool

Comments: Overall experience excluding minor hiccups, network issues,was excellent. It provides a variety of options for test management both for Manual or Automation.

Pros:

Intuitive UI,COLOR CODING, INTEGRATION WITH tools like JIRA, creates a clear link between the test case and the JIRA story assigned. Provides multiple ways to create or upload test cases.Test design is satisfactory when created using qTest .

Cons:

Requirement mapping,for same items belonging to a particular story you still have to manually tag every item with the story.Frustrating. Also unit level management seems quite old and time consuming.

qTest

Pros:

We are using qTest for tracking and creating our Test cases and User Stories and also for keeping a track of bugs

Cons:

The thing that I don't like about this software is that sometimes it works really slow

a cloud based good test management tool

Comments: Overall very good from features but slightly overpriced.

Pros:

QA Symphony did a pretty good job by packaging most of the test management capabilities into it. Starting with its capability to import test cases from Excel spreadsheets or other tools is great. Other notable feature includes complete control over requirement management and traceability and easy to use UI etc.

Cons:

It is highly priced compared to other competitors. Features: lacks a Rich Text Editor option in requirement management module.

Great for our current needs, but could use some improvements

Pros:

I like the integration with JIRA, so we can import requirements into qTest just by tagging them on our JIRA board. From there we can have them organized by team and by sprint. Being able to search by requirement is the most useful feature for me.

Cons:

The UI is a little counterintuitive. To add test cases to a test suite you have to click the 'Statistics' tab then you have the option to add tests. Still don't understand why they named it that.

Our one stop shop for QA

Comments: Overall, I really like using this software. It has the Jira integration, test case creation, test execution sections and good reporting features. We run everything through qTest and export results to Confluence so others have visibility into the work we are doing.

Pros:

I love the Jira integration. We run all our requirements through Jira and import them into qTest when we can link all our test cases to them.

Cons:

The out of box reporting is lacking some basic features that you would think come standard.

Amazing software for QA!

Pros:

Absolutely love the integration with Jira so that we can track all test cases for each requirement

Cons:

Would like for it to be more user friendly for those that are not in the QA role

Great Product

Comments: Its helping in ease of doing business and run the agile environment in a smooth way

Pros:

I have been using qtest for a while and I really like it the way it has built up. The integration with jira allows to link JIRA issues against the Qtest which is helpful in overall visibility.

Cons:

The recent removal of precondition/Prerequisite field I didn't like it. In recent version the test pre requisite you cannot add.

Great test management tool

Pros:

I am using it daily and love the fact that you can integrate it with Jira. So you can connect the requirements with the test cases. It is easy to use, has a lot of great features. You can export/import test cases in excel/word.

Cons:

Maybe the fact that the refresh is taking some time.

Useful for test traceability, good integration with JIRA

Pros:

The software has a good workflow allowing traceability of requirements right through to individual test runs. It is easy to separate releases and produce reports on test summary once finished.

Cons:

The UI looks unappealing and third party automation tools are generally not supported, as Tricentis want you to use Tosca for automation with qTest integration. We use Ranorex in our team and unfortunately this cannot hook up into qTest.

Great product for Test Management

Comments: qTest Solved our main purpose of test management. Additionally, Jira integration helped to continue existing tools.

Pros:

Ease of operation. Uploading TC, Execution, Releases, Jira Integration

Cons:

Some times the slow response, nice to have automated test execution reports on email

qTest is Quality for Testing

Pros:

Easy to use and understand Good Support and Training sessions

Cons:

qTest Insights didn't have the best options for displaying data/test cases.

Overall good

Pros:

Documenting all the test scenarios and regression test results with bug attached

Cons:

The jira integration sometimes not working

Gets the job done

Comments: We use qTest to write test cases and test plans and track them to completion. It also integrates with our Jira platform for defects which is very handy.

Pros:

It's quick and concise, easy to use and is very intuitive for what you may need to do with it.

Cons:

There are some minor hassles like dragging to reorder things being finicky but that's more of a minor nitpick.