--- description: Learn more about BrowserStack price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Australia. Read reviews from verified users and discover similar tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack Cost & Reviews - Capterra Australia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.au/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale \& optimize testing. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 764 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses BrowserStack? Developer teams across industries including but not limited to Finance and Insurance, Education, Technology, Media \& Publishing, Retail, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 764 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: USD 39.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Monitoring - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Archiving & Retention - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing - Bottleneck Identification - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Tracking - Continuous Integration - Data Visualization - Defect Tracking - Document Management - Hierarchical View - Incident Management - Issue Tracking - Load Scenarios - Load Testing - Mobile Testing - Monitoring - Multiple Test Types - Network Monitoring - Performance Management - Performance Metrics - Performance Testing Tools - Project Management - Quality Assurance - Quantitative Metrics - Reporting/Analytics - Repository Management - Requirements Management - Risk Management - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Surveys & Feedback - Test Script Reviews - Testing Management - Testing Scripts - Traceability - Version Control - Video recording/Transcriptions - Web Testing - Workflow Management ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Load Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Test Management Tools](https://www.capterra.com.au/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [UserQ](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1037462/userq) — 4.6/5 (12 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (68 reviews) 4. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/1028715/testomatio) — 4.8/5 (22 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great product that we could not live without\!" — 4.0/5 > **Clinton** | *29 March 2026* | Leisure, Travel & Tourism | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack's design is intuitive and the product is easy to use. The breadth of real devices available for testing across devices provides valuable automated functional and visual regression testing that is not possible using only developer tools like chrome. > > **Cons**: ApplePay integration on the base tier would be helpful for testing payments. I feel the process of getting network logs could be made a lot simpler. > > Outside of owning a plethora of real devices, there is no other option better than using BrowserStack. As they layer on better test management and visual regression the tool gets better, although it would be better value for money if not all of these always came at an additional cost. ----- ### "Very good mobile device and cross browser coverage" — 5.0/5 > **Soundararajan** | *9 April 2026* | Health, Wellness & Fitness | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What we like most about BrowserStack is its real-device cloud and the ease of testing across many browsers and devices without managing hardware ourself. > > **Cons**: Common pain point is that BrowserStack is slow at times Pricing is relatively high compared to other similar cloud providers > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack is positive. It makes the cross-browser and real-device testing much easier, improved test coverage, and saves time by removing the need to manage our own device lab. ----- ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Platform That Saves Time" — 5.0/5 > **Farrukh** | *9 April 2026* | Nonprofit Organization Management | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I liked most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser and cross-device testing. Instead of trying to maintain multiple physical devices or different browser setups locally, everything is available in one place. The access to real devices is especially valuable because it gives me more reliable results than relying on emulators. it can integrates with existing test frameworks and CI/CD pipelines, which helps speed up regression testing. Overall, it saves a lot of time, improves testing coverage, and makes debugging compatibility issues much easier. > > **Cons**: Sometimes it becomes tricky to access the sites behind firewall specially when the ip is not static. we have to whitelist the ip everytime it changes > > The interface is straightforward, and it doesn’t take long for developers. It makes cross-browser and cross-device validation much easier, especially when checking responsive layouts, JavaScript behaviour, and UI consistency. Having access to real devices instead of emulators. Automation support is one of the biggest advantages. Integrating automated test suites into CI/CD pipelines reduce execution time significantly ----- ### "Great product" — 5.0/5 > **Ash** | *3 April 2026* | Hospitality | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: Simple and clean UI. Very broad range of real devices and browsers for testing. It's reliable and the parallel testing feature saves a lot of time. > > **Cons**: Nothing really stands out as a major issue for me. Everything worked smoothly during my testing. Pricing perhaps a bit high for small teams. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack is excellent. The simple UI combined with a broad range of real devices and browsers makes testing very efficient and reliable. Parallel testing saves a lot of time, and I haven't faced any major issues so far. It's a solid platform that delivers what it promises. ----- ### "Efficient Cross‑Device Testing Experience with BrowserStack" — 5.0/5 > **Borys** | *1 April 2026* | Financial Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Fast access to a wide range of real devices and browsers, which makes testing quick and efficient without setup overhead. > > **Cons**: sometimes our systems Push notifications don’t behave the same way as on real mobile physical devices > > Overall, our experience with BrowserStack has been positive. It provides fast and convenient access to a wide range of real devices and browsers, which makes cross‑platform testing efficient and easy without maintaining physical hardware. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.au/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data